"We can't forget the fact that although at a particular point in time we never found any WMD down there, he clearly had had WMD. He clearly had had the beginnings of a nuclear program," Thompson told an audience of about 60 at a Newton cafe.
What's worse... deceiving people by obscuring the facts, or deceiving people once the facts have become known?
Follow Thompson's illogic: 'the absence of evidence is [somehow] evidence.'
Is it that impossible to admit a mistake?